I understand your predicament, and I want to assure you that it is entirely normal to feel overwhelmed at this stage of your dissertation journey. You have come to the right place for immediate guidance and practical solutions to get you back on track.
You are facing challenges in Chapter 2 literature review, specifically the area of hypertension adherence in minorities. Let's break down your concerns into tangible steps to resolve them.
Theoretical Foundation & Academic Criteria
First, let's address the theoretical foundations and academic standards you need to adhere to while tackling Chapter 2.
The literature review in your dissertation is essential as it demonstrates your understanding of the research topic, critical analysis skills, and ability to synthesize evidence-based knowledge from diverse sources. Your professor or advisor has offered valuable feedback on your chapter, highlighting the need for improvement, but don't worry too much. Let's break down the issues into manageable sections:
Understanding the Problem: What went wrong?
Your advisor is concerned with:
- Failing to synthesize recent research findings in the literature review chapter
- Inadequate synthesis of diverse evidence in the literature review chapter
- Lack of critical analysis evaluating hypertension adherence in minority populations
- Improper application of the John Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Competencies framework in Chapter 2
To address these challenges, let's first look at the John Hopkins EBP Competencies:
Evidenced-Based Practice Competencies Framework:
| Competency | Explanation | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate research findings and formulate a clinical question | This competency focuses on understanding the evidence base, formulating a focused research question (PICO format), and evaluating research studies. |
|
| Apply EBP principles to guide your research project | This competency requires applying the EBP principles (evidence synthesis, critical analysis, and application) |
|
| Select, evaluate, and apply appropriate research study designs and methods | This competency focuses on selecting relevant research methodologies, evaluating their quality, and applying them to your literature review chapter |
|
| Evaluate the quality of research studies and methods | This competency is crucial for assessing the theoretical and methodological soundness of your selected studies |
|
| Formulate a clear, concise research question and design | Vitally important for demonstrating the relevance of your research and ensuring a focused analysis |
|
| Develop a robust synthesis matrix (Literature Synthesis Matrix) | The synthesis matrix is essential for organizing your body of knowledge and ensuring successful literature synthesis |
|
| Evaluate your data synthesis (SPSS, SAS, or R) | Evaluating data synthesis is essential for demonstrating your data analysis skills |
|
| Enhance your literature synthesis skills (APA 7th edition) | Your literature synthesis skills are critical for demonstrating your ability to synthesize knowledge |
|
| Understand EBP principles (Johns Hopkins, Iowa State) | Mastering Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) principles is vital for passing your dissertation |
|
| Apply SPSS, SAS, or R statistical analysis for effective data analysis | Ensure your data analysis meets the required standards
|
|
|
||
|